Massive Study Reveals How “Hypermutated” Malignant Brain Tumors With Many Mutations Escape Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy
Cancers whose cells are riddled with large numbers of DNA mutations often respond favorably to drugs called checkpoint blockers that unleash the immune system against the tumor. But a new study shows that malignant brain tumors known as gliomas generally don’t respond to the immunotherapy drugs even when the tumor cells are “hypermutated” – having thousands of DNA mutations that, in other kinds of cancer, provoke the immune system into an attack mode.
An analysis of more than 10,000 gliomas and clinical outcomes reported in >Nature by scientists in Boston and Paris found that glioma patients whose tumors were hypermutated actually had no significant benefit when treated with checkpoint blockers. This finding was somewhat unexpected, because immune checkpoint blockers have been shown to be often effective in other types of cancer – including melanoma, colorectal, and endometrial cancers – if their cells have defective DNA damage repair mechanisms and are hypermutated. The results of the study are further evidence of the challenges presented by malignant brain tumors, which are initially treated by surgery but are difficult to remove in their entirety, necessitating systemic treatment radiation and chemotherapy.
Immunotherapy, which has become an important tool in cancer treatment in recent years, has yet to show much benefit in brain tumors. “It seems that in gliomas you can have hundreds or thousands of DNA mutations and the immune system is still suppressed and ultimately unable to recognize cancer cells as being abnormal,” said Mehdi Touat, MD, of the Sorbonne University and neuro-oncologist in Pitié-Salpêtrière hospitals in Paris, a co-first author of the report. Keith Ligon, MD, PhD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, is co-senior author of the study.
The results also suggest that the quality of mutations, not just their absolute number, may be important when predicting who will benefit from immune checkpoint treatments. “Our data indicates that the absence of an immune response in gliomas likely results from several complex aspects of immunosuppression in the brain which will need further characterization,” wrote the authors. “Approaches that increase the tumor microenvironment infiltration by cytotoxic lymphocytes are likely required to improve immunotherapy response in gliomas.”
Ligon noted that the study also showed how treatment with the drug temozolomide – the standard chemotherapy for gliomas – can lead to the tumors becoming hypermutated and resistant to further treatment. Temozolomide (Temodar) does benefit patients, but in some patients it also seems to cause the emergence of hypermutated cells that can resist the drug and then these surviving glioma cells cause the tumors to progress, said Ligon. The researchers said the results do not suggest that temozolomide should not be used in glioma patients, but that once resistance develops, further treatment with temozolomide would not be effective. Instead, they showed that treatment with another chemotherapy drug called lomustine (CeeNU) seemed to still be effective in that setting for some patients.
“We’ve demonstrated that the longer people took temozolomide the more likely it was that their tumors became hypermutated,” said David Reardon, MD, clinical director of Dana-Farber’s Center for Neuro-Oncology and an author on the Nature report. He said the finding that treatment with lomustine was not associated with the hypermutated resistant state is a glimmer of good news. “If a patient becomes resistant to temozolomide, there is not much to offer them, but this suggests that some of these patients might get benefit from lomustine. Our data suggests we could try this.”
The report’s authors include investigators from Dana-Farber, Brigham and Women’s, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, and Pitié-Salpêtrière hospitals in Paris, France, among others. Co-senior authors are Ligon, who is director of the Center for Patient Derived Models at Dana-Farber and chief of the Division of Neuropathology at Brigham and Women’s, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard; Franck Bielle, MD, PhD, of the Sorbonne University; Rameen Beroukhim, MD, PhD, of Dana-Farber, Brigham and Women’s, and Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard; and Pratiti Bandopadhayay, MBBS, PhD, of the Dana-Farber/Children’s, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. Touat of Dana-Farber and Sorbonne University and Yvonne Y. Li, PhD of Dana-Farber and Broad Institute are co-first authors.
By pooling their resources, and thanks to the integration of Dana-Farber’s Profile program, the AACR GENIE project and other public datasets as well as a large genomics dataset through a partnership with the company Foundation Medicine, they obtained a global sample of 10,200 tumors, the first of this size for a cancer study on a single type of cancer. Of the total, 6,100 tumors were glioblastomas, the most lethal and hard-to-treat type of glioma.
This article was originally published on April 15, 2020, by Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. It is republished with permission.